Audit and framing
Interviews, architecture review and data assessment, consolidated into one readiness picture and a first business case.
Most AI programmes stall between a convincing prototype and a system the business can rely on. The gap is engineering: data, architecture, evaluation, permissions and monitoring.
I work as an AI consultant and cloud architect: I audit what exists, design the target architecture and stay until the system runs in production.
Readiness across data, architecture and compliance drives a prioritised use-case portfolio and a phased roadmap.
Interviews, architecture review and data assessment, consolidated into one readiness picture and a first business case.
Target architecture, model and provider trade-offs, security constraints and a sequenced plan with explicit decision points.
Delivery with your team, evaluation and observability in place, then a documented runbook and a clean handover.
Assess what your data and architecture can support, rank the use cases that are worth building, design the target system and help deliver it. The output is a technical decision, not a maturity score.
Options are compared against your constraints: data volumes, latency, security, operating cost and the skills of your team. The report documents why each option was kept or rejected.
Yes. The engagement is designed to make your team autonomous: pairing, architecture reviews and a written runbook are part of the delivery.
Both, but as separate decisions. You can stop after the audit and the roadmap, or continue with a scoped build.
Region, model hosting and data flows are part of the architecture. Sovereign cloud and EU-hosted models are considered when residency constraints require them.